I started the experiment by metering off my 18% gray lens cloth for correct exposure, then I put a colorful item in the same light (on the cloth) and keeping the aperture the same over and underexposing by 1 stop at ISO 200, 400, 800 and 1600.
Here is an example of the full image
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6be45/6be45adaddf06dde513abe8d9ff62e7e07a98952" alt=""
The rest of the images will be 100% crops of a similar part of that image, the info for each image is written on it. All have been corrected back to what the gray card indicated as a correct exposure in Canon's Digital Photo Professional, no sharpening or other post processing besides cropping and adding the text was done.
The 100% crops are not of the focal point, I selected the part of the image that best showed the noise.
ISO 200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5232/a5232ffb3ee51726bc06ad98d6c97fc67d0b8a15" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5d99/d5d9937fcbef520f0e80fb7519312bbc55b086ab" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1497/c1497393e5f26d9ee179a8c4af99cda4ee3357e7" alt=""
ISO 400
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78d8f/78d8fb645958cb53b27e37615b6ebfd454fc71ee" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4844/e4844e5e9d44813ce53d0982fc04eac2bd9badf5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f551/2f551de578af17de2d3b2ac2083b1a23f76b4aea" alt=""
ISO 800
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adeaa/adeaa2f31717db799b0b8606fc809caa5bb6a08e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/097fc/097fcdde709e401be7ef38ace633b8bc9af5c9f5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d43/41d43fbbaa352fbcd42aa544d5c6764e644be440" alt=""
ISO 1600
http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=7946678593854956030
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c6e3/7c6e36c86e48bde875711cbe946efb99555c21ba" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5613/d561313c95b15574970df25bbabb2c7136c1c7cb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26bb2/26bb2fa23ea5f35f4619705c67c45e55f44860ea" alt=""
I think it is quite clear that you have more noise when you underexpose and bring your exposure up than shooting at that higher ISO and getting the exposure correct in camera. Thoughts?
2 comments:
Very interesting! It makes sense to see noise in an under/over exposed situation, but I didn't realize it was THAT noticeable.
All the more reason to nail exposure right to begin with, huh?
Thanks for posting this Michele! It is great to see the side-by-side comparisons.
Post a Comment